In principle, any particular type of expansion or projection can be interpreted in either way, either as "paratactic" or as "hypotactic"; but in fact there is some degree of partial association: certain combinations are favoured, and others correspondingly disfavoured. For example, in English, when one process is construed as a simple restatement of, or addition to, another, the two are likely to have equal status; whereas where one is seen as enhancing the other they are usually unequal — a means is secondary to what has been achieved by it, a cause is secondary to its effect. (Note that these are overall quantitative tendencies; in any one instance the choice may go either way.)
Friday, 8 July 2022
Taxis And Expansion
Halliday & Matthiessen (1999: 521):
Labels:
Elaboration,
Enhancement,
Expansion,
Hypotaxis,
Ideational,
Interdependency,
Lexicogrammar,
Parataxis
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)