Halliday & Matthiessen (2014: 562):
This is the traditional category of ‘coordination’. Here the semantic relationship is one of ‘and, or, nor, but, but not’, as in the following examples:[verbal group:]
(I) neither like nor dislike (it).
America can – and should – be proud of its soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines.
There are, and can be, no general answers.
[nominal group:]
All the King’s horses and all the King’s men (couldn’t put Humpty Dumpty together again).
Bruce and Philip were friends, || Jane and I were friends || and then you and –
Either you or your head (must be off, and that in about half no time).
[adverbial group/prepositional phrase:]
Swiftly and without a moment’s hesitation (he leapt into the fray).
Yes, insofar as they are driven to work by the need for survival; or by material reward, ...