Tuesday 20 January 2015

Range: Interpersonal Potential

Halliday & Matthiessen (1999: 171):
The Range element is not very likely to function as Subject in the clause: that is, to be entrusted with the interpersonal function of carrying the burden of the argument. This means that passive clauses with Range as Subject are very much rarer than those where Subject is Goal; and where they do occur, the participant that is functioning as Medium (Actor, Senser or Sayer) also tends to be of a generalised kind. Thus tennis is played by everyone is not uncommon, whereas tennis is played by Sharon is a highly marked construction. Again, the category of Range/Attribute provides the limiting case. An Attribute can never serve as Subject in the clause.

Blogger Note: Range occurs in identifying clauses as Value/Identifier; i.e. 'decoding' clauses only.

e.g. Who was (played by) Michael Gambon?


The Singing Detective
was (played by)
Michael Gambon
Value/Identifier/Range
Process: relational: identifying
Token/Identified/Medium
Subject
Finite
Complement
New
Given
Theme
Rheme